Bug 1214081

Summary: [RFE] Support read-only service dialog fields
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Greg McCullough <gmccullo>
Component: AutomateAssignee: Greg McCullough <gmccullo>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Shveta <sshveta>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.4.0CC: adahms, jhardy, mfeifer, mkanoor, obarenbo, ssainkar, sshveta, tfitzger
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 5.4.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
This version of CloudForms Management Engine provides a read-only text box to all dialog fields to enable marking a field read-only that the user cannot modify. The read-only flag can be set through the automate method.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-16 12:59:25 UTC Type: Feature Request
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Greg McCullough 2015-04-21 21:42:42 UTC
Description of problem:
All service dialog fields controls are active and can be modified by a user.  As a service dialog designer I want to provide a read-only text box to provide descriptive text that I do not want the user to modify.  This would also extend to other dialog fields where I may want a user to see a value being provided but not allow them to change it.  For example in cloud provisioning I may want to let the user see what instance type will be used but not allow them to modify it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.4

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a service dialog and add fields
2. 
3.

Actual results: 
Read-only option does not exist today.

Expected results:
Fields can be marked as read-only and when the dialog is displayed the user cannot modify the field.

Additional info:

Comment 4 Shveta 2015-04-29 21:25:32 UTC
Not fixed in 5.4.0.0.22.20150420163946_26004d1  .
WIll check in next build

Comment 5 Shveta 2015-04-30 21:58:43 UTC
Implemented in 5.4.0.0.24.20150427192818_1fd9e49

Comment 6 Marianne Feifer 2015-05-19 19:48:54 UTC
Setting requires_doc_text?, but there may be a doc BZ already cloned for this.  Setting Needinfo? for Andrew to confirm.

Comment 7 Andrew Dahms 2015-06-09 13:13:23 UTC
Hi Marianne,

Thank you for the needinfo request.

I think it would be good to include the doc text for this bug in the release notes; leaving flag set in its current state for review.

Kind regards,

Andrew

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-06-16 12:59:25 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1100.html