Bug 1217563

Summary: Review Request: bonecp - JDBC Connection Pool
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: gil cattaneo <puntogil>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-05 09:27:45 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1089552    

Description gil cattaneo 2015-04-30 16:08:57 UTC
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/bonecp.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/bonecp-0.8.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description:
BoneCP is a Java JDBC connection pool implementation that
is tuned for high performance by minimizing lock contention to
give greater throughput for your applications. It currently
beats all known connection pools, including C3P0 and DBCP,
as shown on the benchmark section on the site.
Fedora Account System Username: gil

Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9609123

Comment 2 Upstream Release Monitoring 2015-11-07 12:37:04 UTC
gil's scratch build of bonecp-0.8.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11741027

Comment 3 Raphael Groner 2016-06-19 18:11:14 UTC
Did you report the test failures to upstream because skipped in spec file?

Comment 4 gil cattaneo 2016-06-19 18:22:37 UTC
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3)
> Did you report the test failures to upstream because skipped in spec file?

"BoneCP SHOULD NOW BE CONSIDERED DEPRECATED in favour of HikariCP"
say that I leave this bug only open if, unfortunately, it is necessary to use this ...

Comment 5 Raphael Groner 2016-07-17 15:12:46 UTC
Bug seems to got lost.

Comment 6 gil cattaneo 2016-08-05 09:27:45 UTC
NO more interested