Bug 1217563 - Review Request: bonecp - JDBC Connection Pool
Summary: Review Request: bonecp - JDBC Connection Pool
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1089552
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-04-30 16:08 UTC by gil cattaneo
Modified: 2016-08-05 09:28 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-05 09:27:45 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description gil cattaneo 2015-04-30 16:08:57 UTC 
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/bonecp.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/bonecp-0.8.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description:
BoneCP is a Java JDBC connection pool implementation that
is tuned for high performance by minimizing lock contention to
give greater throughput for your applications. It currently
beats all known connection pools, including C3P0 and DBCP,
as shown on the benchmark section on the site.
Fedora Account System Username: gil

Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9609123
Comment 1 gil cattaneo 2015-11-07 12:32:25 UTC 
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/bonecp.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/bonecp-0.8.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
Comment 2 Upstream Release Monitoring 2015-11-07 12:37:04 UTC 
gil's scratch build of bonecp-0.8.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11741027
Comment 3 Raphael Groner 2016-06-19 18:11:14 UTC 
Did you report the test failures to upstream because skipped in spec file?
Comment 4 gil cattaneo 2016-06-19 18:22:37 UTC 
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3)
> Did you report the test failures to upstream because skipped in spec file?

"BoneCP SHOULD NOW BE CONSIDERED DEPRECATED in favour of HikariCP"
say that I leave this bug only open if, unfortunately, it is necessary to use this ...
Comment 5 Raphael Groner 2016-07-17 15:12:46 UTC 
Bug seems to got lost.
Comment 6 gil cattaneo 2016-08-05 09:27:45 UTC 
NO more interested
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.