Bug 1220115
Summary: | Traceback on VM destroy in mom log | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | rhev-integ |
Component: | mom | Assignee: | Martin Sivák <msivak> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Shira Maximov <mshira> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.5.0 | CC: | dfediuck, ecohen, gklein, istein, lsurette, mshira, msivak, rgolan, sbonazzo, sherold, yeylon |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream |
Target Release: | 3.5.4 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | sla | ||
Fixed In Version: | mom-0.4.1-5.el6ev | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1170512 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2015-07-05 07:44:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | SLA | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1170512 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Comment 2
Shira Maximov
2015-05-28 08:19:43 UTC
> tried to verify on : > MOM version : mom-0.4.1-5.el6ev.noarch > RHEVM Version: 3.5.3-0.2.el6ev Martin, shouldn't be mom at 0.4.4[1]? [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=637140 Nope, RHEV uses 0.4.1 as the base version and fixes (only handful of them) are added as patches. But the log is still supposed to contain the traceback. The patch just adds the explanation message. Commit message: The stacktrace will still get logged, but there will be human readable reason why it happened. Please note that this situation is rare so we shouldn't have problems with log floods i think that the fix should be change because it was not implemented correctly as jmoskovc wrote: The proper fix here is to handle the exception in nicer way and just print a warning that the VM dissapeared while mom was processing it. in the fix, the message is not more clear, it's still writen that "the vm does not exists" instead of "the VM dissapeared while mom was processing it" also, it should be a warning and not an error. Martin can we refine the message be an info so users won't see errors. after all this is a valid use case - A VM can go down during a mom cycle. |