Bug 1220505

Summary:	VMs ordered from a service are not being enumerated
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	Greg McCullough <gmccullo>
Component:	Automate	Assignee:	Greg McCullough <gmccullo>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Aziza Karol <akarol>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	5.3.0	CC:	akarol, cbolz, cpelland, dajohnso, fdewaley, jhardy, jocarter, lavenel, mfeifer, mkanoor, obarenbo, pkovar, sshveta, tfitzger
Target Milestone:	GA	Keywords:	ZStream
Target Release:	5.3.5
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	5.3.5.1	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Previously, when ordering from a service, the VMs provisioned by that service were not being enumerated. If a second user provisioned, that user's provision failed with a duplicate VM name conflict. This was because create_request_task did not yield task before saving. With this update, create_request_task was changed to yield task before saving. This has resolved the bug and VMs are now enumerated for each service request.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1219098	Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-07-15 12:55:38 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1219098
Bug Blocks:

Comment 1 Greg McCullough 2015-06-04 19:00:39 UTC

Commits on cfme/5.3.z:
6a875c38b4823e3d6e2f9acbb77163e4043a5c4e
65a6728b69aad96ac6e220818412ac8f86006253
44b20d4c22c5429aa58987640ce6e73348be1b4b

Comment 3 Shveta 2015-07-01 03:49:59 UTC

Blocked by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238036

Comment 4 Shveta 2015-07-01 15:38:13 UTC

vm's are enumerated.
verified in 5.3.5.1.20150630091250_5515226

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-15 12:55:38 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1223.html