Bug 1221045
| Summary: | glusterfs-extra-xlators package is NOT being pulled in when installing the glusterfs-server | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Prasanth <pprakash> |
| Component: | build | Assignee: | Bug Updates Notification Mailing List <rhs-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | storage-qa-internal <storage-qa-internal> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rhgs-3.1 | CC: | annair, asrivast, bugs, gluster-bugs, nlevinki, nsathyan, pprakash, rcyriac, rhs-bugs, sasundar, sgraf, vagarwal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-06-15 13:33:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Prasanth
2015-05-13 08:20:32 UTC
It looks like the patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10753 would make the glusterfs-extra-xlators package not essential for glusterfs server functionality (In reply to Rejy M Cyriac from comment #1) > It looks like the patch > > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10753 > > would make the glusterfs-extra-xlators package not essential for glusterfs > server functionality Yes, marker.so is incorrectly provided by glusterfs-extra-xlators, it will be actually provided by glusterfs-server package. There is already a bug tracking this change From recent discussions, it appears that the glusterfs-extra-xlators package is not required downstream (In reply to Rejy M Cyriac from comment #4) > From recent discussions, it appears that the glusterfs-extra-xlators package > is not required downstream In that case, I feel this bug could be CLOSED as NOTABUG. Any suggestions/justification to keep it open ? (In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #7) > (In reply to Rejy M Cyriac from comment #4) > > From recent discussions, it appears that the glusterfs-extra-xlators package > > is not required downstream > > In that case, I feel this bug could be CLOSED as NOTABUG. > Any suggestions/justification to keep it open ? Indeed, glusterfs-extras-xlators is only useful for developers and users doing certain tests. The xlators the package contains are not configurable through the glusterfs-cli, and require manual editing of .vol files (not supported for RHGS customers). Prasanth, do you still hit problems when glusterfs-extra-xlators is not installed on a Gluster server? If not, please close this bug. (In reply to Niels de Vos from comment #8) > (In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #7) > > (In reply to Rejy M Cyriac from comment #4) > > > From recent discussions, it appears that the glusterfs-extra-xlators package > > > is not required downstream > > > > In that case, I feel this bug could be CLOSED as NOTABUG. > > Any suggestions/justification to keep it open ? > > Indeed, glusterfs-extras-xlators is only useful for developers and users > doing certain tests. The xlators the package contains are not configurable > through the glusterfs-cli, and require manual editing of .vol files (not > supported for RHGS customers). > > Prasanth, do you still hit problems when glusterfs-extra-xlators is not > installed on a Gluster server? If not, please close this bug. Based on above comment, closing this bug. |