Bug 1221567

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-molinillo - Provides support for dependency resolution
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Josef Stribny <jstribny>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: hhorak, leamas.alec, package-review, valtri, vondruch
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: NotReady
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-11 12:08:10 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1172650    

Description Josef Stribny 2015-05-14 11:38:37 UTC 
Spec URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-molinillo.spec
SRPM URL: http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-molinillo-0.2.3-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description: Molinillo is a generic dependency resolution implementation in Ruby.
Fedora Account System Username: jstribny
Comment 1 Alec Leamas 2015-05-21 10:09:30 UTC 
I have pushed two feature branches ruby21 (for f21) and ruby22 (f22). At a glance, this solves this problem. 

In this branch, the ruby plugin is also a separate package, although still within the same srpm. A small step.

I need help from ruby-knowledged people to review and test this branch (anyone, they are identical from s ruby perspective).
Comment 2 Alec Leamas 2015-05-21 10:27:51 UTC 
WTF?! Right comment in wrong bug. Please ignore.
Comment 3 František Dvořák 2015-08-04 14:31:01 UTC 
Would you be interested in review swap with rubygem-aws-sdk-resources?:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249748


Review comments for rubygem-molinillo:

1) new version released in the meantime

2) /usr/bin/env dependency in -doc subpackage (just a hint, maybe it's OK)

Possible solution is 'chmod -x' on spec/resolver_integration_specs/index_from_rubygems.rb .

3) ruby(release) and ruby are probably not needed? (just a hint, maybe it's OK or needed)
Comment 4 Vít Ondruch 2015-08-19 11:18:00 UTC 
Sorry Františku,

But I am not sure this package has independent future in Fedora, since I have asked for bundling exception for this package [1].


[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/560
Comment 5 František Dvořák 2015-08-20 07:46:34 UTC 
No problem.

So even bundling is bundled in the bundler. :-)
Comment 7 Vít Ondruch 2016-10-11 12:08:10 UTC 
There is no use for independent Molinillo package. We are bundling it in Bundler ATM and there is no way around it unfortunately :/