Bug 1222367
Summary: | After publishing content view, content view list shows wrong information. | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | jnikolak | ||||||||||
Component: | Content Views | Assignee: | Walden Raines <walden> | ||||||||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Jameer Pathan <jpathan> | ||||||||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
Priority: | low | ||||||||||||
Version: | 6.1.0 | CC: | bbuckingham, bkearney, rankumar, sthirugn, xdmoon | ||||||||||
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||||||||
Target Release: | Unused | ||||||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2016-09-11 15:42:02 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 1115190 | ||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Created attachment 1026547 [details]
before2
Created attachment 1026548 [details]
after
Created attachment 1026549 [details]
content_view
If we go back to
content view, it said that its not published, but when you click on the Name of the version. Rhel 6.6 it said that it is published
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release. This bug really appears to be reporting 2 issues: 1. the History tab for a content view is not correctly listing the content view version history. This aspect is currently being addressed by bug 1206583 2. after publishing a content view, if the user performs a 'Close' on the content view, the content view list does reflect the status in the 'Last Published' column. For this bug, I think we should address #2. There is a workaround. If the user refreshes the Content -> Content Views page, the 'Last Published' will get updated correctly. Moving 6.2 bugs out to sat-backlog. Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/16268 from this bug *** Bug 1306118 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1355752 *** |
Created attachment 1026546 [details] before Satellite 6.1 Steps to reproduce: Created new content view -> added repository and then published it. The status said that the content view is published. However when going to history, there is no information.