Bug 1230245
| Summary: | nova quota calculation breaks Instance HA | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fdinitto> | ||||||||
| Component: | openstack-nova | Assignee: | Artom Lifshitz <alifshit> | ||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | nlevinki <nlevinki> | ||||||||
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||||||
| Version: | 7.0 (Kilo) | CC: | alifshit, berrange, dasmith, eglynn, fdinitto, kchamart, sbauza, sferdjao, sgordon, srevivo, vromanso | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | z5 | Keywords: | ZStream | ||||||||
| Target Release: | 7.0 (Kilo) | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-06-06 14:17:31 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1185030, 1251948, 1261487 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2015-06-10 13:33:29 UTC
Effectively the problem here appears to be that instances under evacuation should not be double-counted against quota while the instance rebuilds are in-flight. I think this can be reproduced and fixed independently of the instance HA setup. Created attachment 1037323 [details]
sos-report
Created attachment 1037325 [details]
sos-report
Created attachment 1037326 [details]
sos-report
I have tested this same condition with the .10 build and I was not able to reproduce it. It´s probably been fixed in the rebase from .4 to .10, but still worth checking. Lowering priority/severity (In reply to Fabio Massimo Di Nitto from comment #9) > I have tested this same condition with the .10 build and I was not able to > reproduce it. It´s probably been fixed in the rebase from .4 to .10, but > still worth checking. > > Lowering priority/severity Any update on this Fabio - have you encountered this again? I am assuming no and moving to 8.0/7.0.z but please keep me posted. (In reply to Stephen Gordon from comment #10) > (In reply to Fabio Massimo Di Nitto from comment #9) > > I have tested this same condition with the .10 build and I was not able to > > reproduce it. It´s probably been fixed in the rebase from .4 to .10, but > > still worth checking. > > > > Lowering priority/severity > > Any update on this Fabio - have you encountered this again? I am assuming no > and moving to 8.0/7.0.z but please keep me posted. I didn´t test this condition anylonger. It´s worth keeping it as TestOnly bug in my opinion since it touches a specific boundary and it´s easy to test. > I didn´t test this condition anylonger. It´s worth keeping it as TestOnly
> bug in my opinion since it touches a specific boundary and it´s easy to test.
Since this bug hasn't seen any updates for a while, I'm assuming the issue hasn't been encountered again. I'm going to close this bug for now, if you feel it should remain open, don't hesitate to let us know.
Cheers!
|