Bug 1230595
Summary: | 32-bit RPMs are being duplicated for CPL in the final repository | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Artur Szostak <aszostak> |
Component: | cpl | Assignee: | Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 24 | CC: | mmahut, samuel-rhbugs, sergio.pasra |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-07-27 01:01:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Artur Szostak
2015-06-11 08:36:05 UTC
I don't know how to avoid this or if this is my fault I think this is likely a problem with the tools that take the built RPM packages and place them into the public repositories. You should likely contact the people maintaining the build infrastructure tools. Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. This is still present in Fedora 24. See: http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/24/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/c/cpl-7.0-3.fc24.i686.rpm Who would be the right people to ask is this is an infrastructure issue? Can we add them to the CC for this ticket? Sorry, adding the CC cleared the needinfo flag, but I don't think it was necessary anyway. I have asked in the @devel list and this is most likely not a bug, instead is needed by multilib, i.e. running 32 bits apps in 64 bits. Lots of other 32 bits packages appear in 64 bits repos |