Bug 1234836
Summary: | [RFE] rhel-osp-director: network isolation files should be copied to correct location by openstack command | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Ofer Blaut <oblaut> |
Component: | rhosp-director | Assignee: | chris alfonso <calfonso> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | yeylon <yeylon> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | Director | CC: | hbrock, jtrowbri, mburns, oblaut, rhel-osp-director-maint, srevivo |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, UserExperience, ZStream |
Target Release: | Director | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-08-04 18:13:07 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1241148 |
Description
Ofer Blaut
2015-06-23 11:13:10 UTC
Ofer, I would like to clarify what the ask is here. I read this as: "As a cloud deployer, I would like to use the network isolation features without editing any templates." If that is a correct reading, then I would agree that would be a nice to have, but is definitely an RFE and not a bug. If there is a different ask, could you clarify? Respectfully, John Trowbridge (In reply to John Trowbridge from comment #2) > Ofer, > > I would like to clarify what the ask is here. > > I read this as: > > "As a cloud deployer, I would like to use the network isolation features > without editing any templates." it would be great to have just commands. The current implementation requires to create file and also copy other files into new created folder, so i would like to have command which create/move all these files instead of do it manually As cloud developer Wouldn't you prefer all files in one place ? > > If that is a correct reading, then I would agree that would be a nice to > have, but is definitely an RFE and not a bug. moving to RFE > > If there is a different ask, could you clarify? > > Respectfully, > John Trowbridge I definitely agree this would be nice to have. This is being tracked as a roadmap theme by product management to address usability of network isolation configuration in general. I'm going to close this RFE and to remove the need for dual maintenance. |