Bug 1235776

Summary:	libxslt package in RHGS 3.1 advisory is older in comparison to already released package
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Shruti Sampat <ssampat>
Component:	build	Assignee:	Bug Updates Notification Mailing List <rhs-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Shruti Sampat <ssampat>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rhgs-3.1	CC:	annair, asrivast, nlevinki, nsathyan, pprakash, rcyriac, rhs-bugs, sgirijan, sgraf, ssampat, vagarwal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	RHGS 3.1.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-07-29 05:08:10 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1202842

Comment 1 Stanislav Graf 2015-06-25 17:44:45 UTC

# repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rhel-6-server-rpms libxslt.x86_64
libxslt-0:1.1.26-2.el6_3.1.x86_64

This is the version we should use.

Comment 2 Sreenath G 2015-07-06 06:06:13 UTC

Quick analysis
---------------
libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1 comes from RHEL-6.3-Z and hence this was part of RHS-3.0 u4 .

libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6 was tagged to RHGS-3.1-RHEL-6 on an RT ticket[1] by dev-eng so that it overrides the build from RHEL-6.3-Z and it was attached to Errata. So dev-eng need to decide whether this version is correct or not.


[1] https://engineering.redhat.com/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=355535

Comment 4 Rejy M Cyriac 2015-07-06 08:10:01 UTC

libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6.x86_64.rpm is part of the libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6 build

The libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1.x86_64.rpm is the higher version, and this version is currently available at the RHEL6 standard base repo.

But the libxslt-python sub-package is shipped only to the RHEL6 Optional repo.

If we need the libxslt-python sub-package for RHGS 3.1, then we need to ship the libxslt build at the RHGS 3.1 Advisory

But unless we have a specific dependency on libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6 version, we should ship the higher version of the build --> libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1 . Otherwise we have potential for an upgrade break.

Comment 5 Vivek Agarwal 2015-07-06 09:10:36 UTC

Based on what we discussed Rejy, I plan to remove the libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6 from the errata, that way we will move back to libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1.

Comment 8 Sreenath G 2015-07-06 10:40:10 UTC

Based on comment 7, I have untagged libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6 from RHGS-3.1-RHEL-6 , so that the latest build libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1 will be picked up from RHEL, except the sub-pkg libxslt-python which is in RHEL-Optional

Comment 10 Sreenath G 2015-07-07 11:17:06 UTC

libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1.x86_64.rpm is part of latest ISO RHGSS-3.1-20150707.n.0

Comment 11 Shruti Sampat 2015-07-07 19:31:20 UTC

Verified as fixed in RHGSS-3.1-20150707.n.0

Package present in ISO is libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1.x86_64.rpm.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-29 05:08:10 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1495.html