Bug 1235776 - libxslt package in RHGS 3.1 advisory is older in comparison to already released package
Summary: libxslt package in RHGS 3.1 advisory is older in comparison to already releas...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: build
Version: rhgs-3.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.1.0
Assignee: Bug Updates Notification Mailing List
QA Contact: Shruti Sampat
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1202842
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-06-25 17:41 UTC by Shruti Sampat
Modified: 2015-07-29 05:08 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-29 05:08:10 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2015:1495 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.1 update 2015-07-29 08:26:26 UTC

Comment 1 Stanislav Graf 2015-06-25 17:44:45 UTC 
# repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rhel-6-server-rpms libxslt.x86_64
libxslt-0:1.1.26-2.el6_3.1.x86_64

This is the version we should use.
Comment 2 Sreenath G 2015-07-06 06:06:13 UTC 
Quick analysis
---------------
libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1 comes from RHEL-6.3-Z and hence this was part of RHS-3.0 u4 .

libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6 was tagged to RHGS-3.1-RHEL-6 on an RT ticket[1] by dev-eng so that it overrides the build from RHEL-6.3-Z and it was attached to Errata. So dev-eng need to decide whether this version is correct or not.


[1] https://engineering.redhat.com/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=355535
Comment 4 Rejy M Cyriac 2015-07-06 08:10:01 UTC 
libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6.x86_64.rpm is part of the libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6 build

The libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1.x86_64.rpm is the higher version, and this version is currently available at the RHEL6 standard base repo.

But the libxslt-python sub-package is shipped only to the RHEL6 Optional repo.

If we need the libxslt-python sub-package for RHGS 3.1, then we need to ship the libxslt build at the RHGS 3.1 Advisory

But unless we have a specific dependency on libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6 version, we should ship the higher version of the build --> libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1 . Otherwise we have potential for an upgrade break.
Comment 5 Vivek Agarwal 2015-07-06 09:10:36 UTC 
Based on what we discussed Rejy, I plan to remove the libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6 from the errata, that way we will move back to libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1.
Comment 8 Sreenath G 2015-07-06 10:40:10 UTC 
Based on comment 7, I have untagged libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6 from RHGS-3.1-RHEL-6 , so that the latest build libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1 will be picked up from RHEL, except the sub-pkg libxslt-python which is in RHEL-Optional
Comment 10 Sreenath G 2015-07-07 11:17:06 UTC 
libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1.x86_64.rpm is part of latest ISO RHGSS-3.1-20150707.n.0
Comment 11 Shruti Sampat 2015-07-07 19:31:20 UTC 
Verified as fixed in RHGSS-3.1-20150707.n.0

Package present in ISO is libxslt-1.1.26-2.el6_3.1.x86_64.rpm.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-29 05:08:10 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1495.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.