Bug 1240892
Summary: | Review Request: golang-github-creack-termios - Golang terminal management | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | jakub.jedelsky |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jchaloup, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-08-10 00:51:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449, 1234182 |
Description
jakub.jedelsky
2015-07-08 04:56:08 UTC
rpmlint SPECS/golang-github-creack-termios.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint SRPMS/golang-github-creack-termios-0-0.1.git.d60649a.fc22.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I would recommend to regenerate the spec file with the latest support for secondary architectures. There are other improvements like making devel subpackge noarch and adding arch-specific unit-test-devel subpackage for unit tests. Thanks for info, I'll take a look at it. This one is quite old :) https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-creack-termios/golang-github-creack-termios.spec Summary: - noarch devel subpackage - devel subpackage contain only source codes (nothing else) - unit-test-devel subpackage for CI testing - support for secondary architectures - license in %license tag This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. |