Bug 1246526

Summary:	Review Request: golang-github-cznic-mathutil - Utilities supplemental to the Go standard "rand" and "math" packages
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	decathorpe, package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-03-14 11:32:35 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1431732, 1431735, 1431736, 1431740, 1431741, 1431745, 1431748

Description Jan Chaloupka 2015-07-24 13:57:35 UTC

Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-cznic-mathutil/golang-github-cznic-mathutil.spec

SRPM URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-cznic-mathutil/golang-github-cznic-mathutil-0-0.1.gita804f0f.fc20.src.rpm

Description: Utilities supplemental to the Go standard "rand" and "math" packages

Fedora Account System Username: jchaloup

$ rpmlint golang-github-cznic-mathutil-0-0.1.gita804f0f.fc20.src.rpm golang-github-cznic-mathutil-devel-0-0.1.gita804f0f.fc20.noarch.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Koji: it depends on bz#1246524 which is currently on review. Locally it builds fine.

Comment 1 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-02-08 13:43:09 UTC

jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

Comment 2 Athos Ribeiro 2017-03-14 11:02:33 UTC

*** Bug 1431587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Fabio Valentini 2017-03-14 11:27:22 UTC

Are you still interested in this package?

If yes, I can take this review.
If not, I will reopen my duplicate and close this one.