Bug 1246719

Summary:	Review Request: lua-luaprompt - A Lua command prompt with pretty-printing and autocompletion
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jeff Backus <jeff.backus>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	i, package-review, ppisar
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-05-23 00:45:41 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1246718
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Jeff Backus 2015-07-25 02:50:47 UTC

Spec URL: https://jsbackus.fedorapeople.org/lua-luaprompt/lua-luaprompt.spec
SRPM URL: https://jsbackus.fedorapeople.org/lua-luaprompt/lua-luaprompt-0.6-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description:
luaprompt is both an interactive Lua prompt that can be used instead
of the official interpreter, as well as a module that provides a Lua
command prompt that can be embedded in a host application.  As a
standalone interpreter it provides many conveniences that are missing
from the official Lua interpreter.  As an embedded prompt, it is meant
for applications that use Lua as a configuration or interface language
and can therefore benefit from an interactive prompt for debugging or
regular use.

Fedora Account System Username: jsbackus

Comment 1 Jeff Backus 2015-07-28 03:05:20 UTC

Koji Builds:
Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10503875
F23: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10503914
F22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10503923
F21: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10503933
EPEL7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10503942

Comment 2 Christopher Meng 2015-08-21 05:12:20 UTC

I need a review swap, will you accept?

Comment 3 Jeff Backus 2015-08-21 17:16:20 UTC

(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2)
> I need a review swap, will you accept?

Sure, I'd be happy to. Please point me to the bug.

Comment 4 Jeff Backus 2015-08-22 15:32:10 UTC

It looks like you have quite a few packages in need of review. :) If you have a preference as to which one I review, please let me know. Otherwise I'll just grab one.

Comment 5 Jeff Backus 2015-10-02 12:34:14 UTC

Hi Christopher,

Just wanted to check in to see how things are going.

Regards,
Jeff

Comment 6 Jeff Backus 2015-12-13 13:56:02 UTC

Hi Christopher,

Just checking in. Any progress?

Regards,
Jeff

Comment 7 Jeff Backus 2016-02-22 12:57:51 UTC

Hi Christopher,

Haven't heard from you in a while, so I'm going clear the assigned flag. I'm still willing to review a package for you, just give me an e-mail. Hope all is well on your end.

Regards,
Jeff

Comment 8 Package Review 2021-04-23 00:45:21 UTC

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 9 Package Review 2021-05-23 00:45:41 UTC

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.