Bug 1255823
| Summary: | manpages missing from rhel-tools image | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | James W. Mills <jamills> |
| Component: | rhel-tools-container | Assignee: | Eliska Slobodova <eslobodo> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Martin Jenner <mjenner> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 7.1 | CC: | dwalsh, jeder, jkrieger, sghosh, vigoyal, walters, yruseva, zdover |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression |
| Target Release: | 7.1 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-09-15 15:45:25 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1186913, 1252566 | ||
|
Description
James W. Mills
2015-08-21 16:03:38 UTC
Hi, The article about rhel-tools mentions that it contains man pages: https://access.redhat.com/articles/1336853 (in the Overview section) I am not sure if the respective articles about rsyslog and sadc should mention that they do NOT contain man pages, since this is expected behaviour. Additionally, there are two other places where a note can go: 1) the Release Notes, under "Other Notes", explaining that no man pages is the expected behaviour, unless there is a workaround as in the case of rhel-tools 2) the "Running Super Privileged Containers..." article: https://access.redhat.com/articles/1342703 I think both should be updated. Ok, after consulting Eliska, I learned it's about the base images, and in this case the most appropriate places are the Release Notes and the "Recommended Practices for Container Development" article: https://access.redhat.com/articles/1483053. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1802.html |