Bug 1256591

Summary: Data Tiering: Database locks observed on tiered volumes on continous writes to a file
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Vivek Agarwal <vagarwal>
Component: glusterfsAssignee: Jan Staněk <jstanek>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Anoop <annair>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 6.8CC: asrivast, dgregor, dlambrig, josferna, nchilaka, ndevos, nsathyan, rcyriac, salmy, sankarshan, sgirijan, smohan, ssaha, tlavigne, vagarwal
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1240569 Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-09-23 13:19:24 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1240569    

Comment 2 Rejy M Cyriac 2015-08-28 14:39:50 UTC 
The WAL journaling mode does not work in sqlite 3.6.20-1 available at RHEL 6. 

WAL Journaling mode is absolutely required for the Data Tiering feature of Red Hat Gluster Storage on RHEL 6

It is required to upgrade sqlite version on RHEL 6.7 to sqlite 3.7 and above, which supports WAL journaling mode
Comment 3 Dan Lambright 2015-09-22 20:06:26 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1265399 ***
Comment 4 Rejy M Cyriac 2015-09-23 04:13:03 UTC 
(In reply to Dan Lambright from comment #3)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1265399 ***

Why was this BZ on RHEL6 closed as a DUPLICATE of an upstream bug?!

Re-opening this BZ, and changing the summary to reflect the objective of this BZ on RHEL6
Comment 5 Dan Lambright 2015-09-23 13:19:24 UTC 
We have a a software workaround for this problem described in 1265399. It solves the data base lock problem, but because it still uses the old sqlite without WAL, performance is poor. Also, my understanding is we will not be able to get the newer sqlite on RHEL6 in any circumstances. If you know differently, Mr Cyriac, I would be greatly interested in hearing that. This bug should not be the NEW state. I would say it is resolved as WONTFIX if its not a duplicate.