Bug 1258437

Summary: Reversed buffered-cached memory in ad-hoc reports
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Petr Matyáš <pmatyas>
Component: ovirt-engine-reportsAssignee: Shirly Radco <sradco>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Petr Matyáš <pmatyas>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 3.6.0CC: gklein, lsurette, pstehlik, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, sbonazzo, sradco, yeylon, ykaul, ylavi
Target Milestone: ovirt-3.6.1   
Target Release: 3.6.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: rhevm-reports-3.6.1.1-1.el6ev Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-03-09 21:20:38 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Reports RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1203189    

Description Petr Matyáš 2015-08-31 11:42:12 UTC
Description of problem:
In ad-hoc reports when you add buffered and cached memory, it shows up the other way around. Under buffer memory you find value for cached and under cached memory you find cached.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhevm-reports-3.6.0-0.5.el6ev.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create new ad-hoc statistics hourly report
2. add VM_name to rows
3. add buffered and cached memory to columns

Actual results:
reversed values

Expected results:
correct values

Additional info:

Comment 1 Petr Matyáš 2015-12-07 10:19:03 UTC
Values are still reversed.

Build tested 3.6.1-2
rhevm-reports-3.6.1-1.el6ev.noarch
jasperreports-server-pro-6.0.1-1.el6ev.noarch

Comment 2 Petr Matyáš 2015-12-10 12:06:22 UTC
Still reversed

Build 3.6.1-3
rhevm-reports-3.6.1.1-1.el6ev.noarch
jasperreports-server-pro-6.0.1-1.el6ev.noarch

Comment 3 Petr Matyáš 2015-12-10 12:08:49 UTC
Sorry, I tested old ad-hoc report. When I created new one, it works correctly.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2016-03-09 21:20:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-0425.html