Bug 126
Summary: | Reboot after upgrade fails to mount | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Stephen Vance <steve> |
Component: | mount | Assignee: | Cristian Gafton <gafton> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 1998-12-10 23:43:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Stephen Vance
1998-11-18 23:44:02 UTC
What are those "stale automounter entries in fstab" ? I've seen this as well. If there are any net: entries in fstab, you are totally screwed. mount fails horribly. I encountered the same issue, and fixed it by commenting out the net and automounter lines from /etc/fstab... Happened to me too. I had in fstab "/dev/hda4 none ignore 0 0 0" for an extended partition, and after the upgrade (from 5.0) mount did not read fstab info for any entries below that. I circumvented it by moving the "stale entry" to be the last one. It seems to only happen on SCSI systems. Not true --- I have an all-IDE system! I have been able to verify this as a problem. I added the following line to a working 5.0 install. /dev/hda5 none ignore 0 0 0 5.0 would boot up fine and mount all entries before and after this line properly. I then did an upgrade to 5.2. When the machine came back up, the partitions that I had listed in fstab after this line no longer would mount. I removed the line and rebooted, everything mounted properly. Invalid fstab entries will cause this behavior. Mount will refuse to keep going when it reaches an invalid mount line in order to avoid thrashing the machine because of the invalid entries. It is assumed that if the fstab is invalid/corrupted, then the safest thing to do is to ignore it. Kind of a pain sometimes, but there really isn't an alorithm of deciding what to ignore from an invalid mount line. I had the same thing happen, but I would like to make a point, even though you say it is a closed issue. If a partition was a valid entry in redhat 5.0-5.1 and a user upgrades to 5.2 (or at least upgrades the mount package), shouldn't the system handle the changes? I would also like to note that the problem with my fstab is the "ignore" flag. any line with the "ignore" flag in it causes the rest of the fstab to fail. If you look at fstab's man page, ignore is a valid flag, therefore, mount is failing on a VALID fstab file, not a corrupted or invalid one. If this is not the case (i.e. the ignore flag is no longer supported) at the very least, the documentation should be updated to reflect that. If it is the case, mount should be fixed. -Steve |