Bug 1260004

Summary: regression -- COS cache doesn't properly mark vattr cache as invalid when there are multiple suffixes
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jan Kurik <jkurik>
Component: 389-ds-baseAssignee: Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Viktor Ashirov <vashirov>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 6.3CC: amsharma, ccoursey, jgalipea, jkurik, mreynolds, msauton, nhosoi, nkinder, rmeggins, vashirov
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-62.el6_7 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, when the user attempted to add multiple class of service (CoS) definitions, Directory Server only added the first definition. This update fixes a regression in the CoS cache that caused this problem. As a result, Directory Server adds all CoS definitions as expected.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1259546 Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-09-22 14:02:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1259546    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Jan Kurik 2015-09-04 07:03:55 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #1259546 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.7 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 5 Amita Sharma 2015-09-07 13:53:11 UTC 
​http://wiki.idm.lab.bos.redhat.com/qa/archive/beaker/RHEL-6.7-20150702.0/i386/389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-62.el6_7.i686/Linux/20150907-091908.html

​http://wiki.idm.lab.bos.redhat.com/qa/archive/beaker/RHEL-6.7-20150702.0/x86_64/389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-62.el6_7.x86_64/Linux/20150907-091426.html 

Hence marking as VERIFIED
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2015-09-22 14:02:28 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1816.html
Comment 8 Nathan Kinder 2016-01-28 16:54:01 UTC 
*** Bug 1268915 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***