Bug 1265906

Summary: zstream clone: Two instances of UpdateStorageDomainCommand/ExtendSANStorageDomainCommand executed concurrently
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: rhev-integ
Component: ovirt-engineAssignee: Fred Rolland <frolland>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Elad <ebenahar>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.5.3CC: acanan, amureini, ecohen, frolland, gwatson, lsurette, nsoffer, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, tnisan, yeylon, ylavi
Target Milestone: ovirt-3.5.6Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: 3.5.6   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: storage
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1258632 Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-01 19:06:10 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Storage RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1258632    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 2 Elad 2015-11-15 15:11:24 UTC
Block domain extension is blocked on CDA on the second executed extend operation.

Sent the following twice:

<storage_domain>
    <storage>
        <override_luns>true</override_luns>
        <logical_unit id="3514f0c5a516008b1"/>
    </storage>
    <host><name>camel-vdsb</name></host>
</storage_domain>


Blocked on CDA:
2015-11-15 15:08:46,075 WARN  [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.ExtendSANStorageDomainCommand] (ajp-/127.0.0.1:8702-10) [6b50ecfb] CanDoAction of action ExtendSANStorageDomain failed for user admin@internal. Reas
ons: VAR__TYPE__STORAGE__DOMAIN,VAR__ACTION__EXTEND,ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_OBJECT_LOCKED


Verified using 3.5.6:
rhevm-3.5.6.2-0.1.el6ev.noarch
vdsm-4.16.29-1.el7ev.x86_64

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2015-12-01 19:06:10 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2531.html