Bug 1266530
Summary: | Display Network port range should be 5900:6923 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Alexandros Gkesos <agkesos> |
Component: | ovirt-node | Assignee: | Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | wanghui <huiwa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 3.5.4 | CC: | bazulay, bgraveno, bmcclain, dougsland, fdeutsch, gklein, leiwang, lsurette, ppostler, pstehlik, ycui, yeylon, ykaul |
Target Milestone: | ovirt-3.6.1 | ||
Target Release: | 3.6.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ovirt-node-3.6.0-0.22.20151126git72acbb2.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Previously, the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor was not updated with the VNC and SPICE ports that VDSM sets in QEMU. Updated the port range in the firewall to 5900:6923 for VNC and Spice usage, to enable customers to see the graphical interface.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-03-09 14:39:21 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Node | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Comment 1
Fabian Deutsch
2015-11-17 08:02:13 UTC
Test version: rhev-hypervisor7-7.2-20151210.1 ovirt-node-3.6.0-0.24.20151209gitc0fa931.el7ev.noarch Test steps: 1. TUI install rhev-hypervisor7-7.2-20151210.1 2. Check the iptables Test result: 1. After step2, it shows as follows. ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 multiport dports 5900:6923 So this issue is fixed in ovirt-node-3.6.0-0.24.20151209gitc0fa931.el7ev.noarch. Change the status to verified. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0378.html |