Bug 1267454
Summary: | It's better to show additional prompt when 'oc patch' non-existing fields of resource | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Xingxing Xia <xxia> |
Component: | oc | Assignee: | David Eads <deads> |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Wei Sun <wsun> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | aos-bugs, ccoleman, jokerman, maszulik, mmccomas |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-02-26 19:10:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Xingxing Xia
2015-09-30 05:56:15 UTC
This is a more general problem with CLI mutations not validating their changes. Create, edit, and update have this same problem when specifying fields that don't exist. I suspect that this will remain as a limitation for some time. Adding Jordan and Clayton so they have a chance to disagree. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409225#c3 Singular "annotation" in bug 1409925 is kind of not-existing field which causes UX problem and makes user confusion because of the prompt "... patched" Again, occurrences of similar confusion appear in bug 1466671 and bug 1466664 |