Bug 1270012
| Summary: | [epel7s390x] java-dirq SRPM does not build correctly on s390x | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy> | ||||
| Component: | java-dirq | Assignee: | lionel.cons | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | high | ||||||
| Version: | epel7 | CC: | dan, dhorak, hannsj_uhl, jkachuck, lionel.cons, massimo.paladin, steve.traylen | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | s390x | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | java-dirq-1.6-4.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-12-12 19:23:58 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1267648 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
IBM Bug Proxy
2015-10-08 19:14:27 UTC
The EPEL 7 SRPM for java-dirq https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/j/java-dirq-1.4-5.el7.src.rpm does not build correctly in Mock on s390x. The test "QueueSimpleTest.purgeMultiDir" fails and bans the RPM from being built. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test set: ch.cern.dirq.QueueSimpleTest ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tests run: 15, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.327 sec <<< FAILURE! - in ch.cern.dirq.QueueSimpleTest purgeMultiDir(ch.cern.dirq.QueueSimpleTest) Time elapsed: 0.014 sec <<< FAILURE! java.lang.AssertionError: null at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86) at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41) at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:64) at org.junit.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:74) at ch.cern.dirq.QueueSimpleTest.purgeMultiDir(QueueSimpleTest.java:297) Created attachment 1081076 [details]
"surefire-reports" for the failed test case
I would love to debug this but, since this is ARM-specific, I would need interactive access to an ARM machine for this. Contact me if you can offer one. I have fixed the problem upstream. java-dirq-1.6-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7c841160e6 java-dirq-1.6-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update java-dirq' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7c841160e6 java-dirq-1.6-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7c841160e6 java-dirq-1.6-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update java-dirq' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7c841160e6 ------- Comment From zwilliam.com 2015-12-02 20:32 EDT------- I just tested the new SRPM from https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/testing/7/SRPMS/j/java-dirq-1.6-4.el7.src.rpm. I can build this SRPM on s390x on Mock now. Thank you! java-dirq-1.6-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. ------- Comment From zwilliam.com 2015-12-12 19:42 EDT------- I just tested https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/j/java-dirq-1.6-4.el7.src.rpm. The source RPM builds fine on s390x on Mock. Thanks again! |