Bug 1270269

Summary: [epel7s390x] josm SRPM does not build correctly on s390x
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy>
Component: josmAssignee: Cédric OLIVIER <cedric.olivier>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: epel7CC: cedric.olivier, dan, dhorak, hannsj_uhl, jkachuck, mcepl
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: s390x   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-14 11:04:58 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1267648    

Description IBM Bug Proxy 2015-10-09 13:02:25 UTC

Comment 1 IBM Bug Proxy 2015-10-09 13:02:27 UTC
The EPEL 7 SRPM for jsom 
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/j/josm-0-0.66.8109svn.el7.src.rpm
does not build correctly in Mock on s390x. 

The spec file has java-devel as a build requirement. However, this package is only able to be built by openJDK, as it relies on openJDK specific features. 

Building this package using IBM JDK will result in some symbol-not-found error.

Comment 2 IBM Bug Proxy 2016-02-23 17:32:02 UTC
------- Comment From vsandhya.com 2016-02-23 12:14 EDT-------
Any updates?

Comment 3 IBM Bug Proxy 2017-03-20 06:30:40 UTC
------- Comment From urjawere.com 2017-03-20 02:25 EDT-------
Any Updates ?

Comment 4 Matěj Cepl 2017-03-21 14:22:03 UTC
We have a bunch of Java packages missing in EPEL-7, starting with apache-commons-jcs. Not sure what to do about them.

Comment 5 IBM Bug Proxy 2020-04-14 08:02:15 UTC
------- Comment From tstaudt.com 2020-04-14 03:53 EDT-------
With no activity in this bug for years, I'm now closing this on the IBM side.
If the problem still needs to be addressed, please re-open or preferably open a new bug.

Thanks.