Bug 1270269 - [epel7s390x] josm SRPM does not build correctly on s390x
Summary: [epel7s390x] josm SRPM does not build correctly on s390x
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: josm
Version: epel7
Hardware: s390x
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Cédric OLIVIER
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: epel7s390x
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-10-09 13:02 UTC by IBM Bug Proxy
Modified: 2020-04-14 11:04 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-14 11:04:58 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
IBM Linux Technology Center 131533 0 None None None 2019-03-25 12:03:16 UTC

Description IBM Bug Proxy 2015-10-09 13:02:25 UTC
Comment 1 IBM Bug Proxy 2015-10-09 13:02:27 UTC 
The EPEL 7 SRPM for jsom 
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/j/josm-0-0.66.8109svn.el7.src.rpm
does not build correctly in Mock on s390x. 

The spec file has java-devel as a build requirement. However, this package is only able to be built by openJDK, as it relies on openJDK specific features. 

Building this package using IBM JDK will result in some symbol-not-found error.
Comment 2 IBM Bug Proxy 2016-02-23 17:32:02 UTC 
------- Comment From vsandhya.com 2016-02-23 12:14 EDT-------
Any updates?
Comment 3 IBM Bug Proxy 2017-03-20 06:30:40 UTC 
------- Comment From urjawere.com 2017-03-20 02:25 EDT-------
Any Updates ?
Comment 4 Matěj Cepl 2017-03-21 14:22:03 UTC 
We have a bunch of Java packages missing in EPEL-7, starting with apache-commons-jcs. Not sure what to do about them.
Comment 5 IBM Bug Proxy 2020-04-14 08:02:15 UTC 
------- Comment From tstaudt.com 2020-04-14 03:53 EDT-------
With no activity in this bug for years, I'm now closing this on the IBM side.
If the problem still needs to be addressed, please re-open or preferably open a new bug.

Thanks.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.