Bug 1278853

Summary: During fusor-undercloud-installer, iptables: bad rule
Product: Red Hat Quickstart Cloud Installer Reporter: Thom Carlin <tcarlin>
Component: fusor-installerAssignee: John Matthews <jmatthew>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Dave Johnson <dajohnso>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.0CC: jmontleo, smallamp
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1292879 1292880 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1292879, 1292880    
Bug Blocks: 1273561    

Description Thom Carlin 2015-11-06 14:49:01 UTC
Description of problem:

Error during fusor-undercloud-installer

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

This install was completed from an ISO with the Media ID 1446663134.881279 at 06:52:14 PM on 04 Nov 2015.

How reproducible:

Unsure, believe 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install TripleO ISO
2. Log in for launch-fusor-undercloud-installer
3.

Actual results:

iptables: bad rule (does a matching rule exist in that chain?)

Expected results:

No error, iptables successfully setup

Additional info:

Command is: add-rule INPUT -p tcp --dport 8088 -j ACCEPT
(says "active" just before error)

Comment 1 Thom Carlin 2015-11-06 15:02:12 UTC
Also occurs further down for:
* port 69
* ports "8773, 8774, 8775"
* ports "5000, 35357"
* port 9696
etc.

Works for:
* port 8585
and other

br-ctlplane also fails just below these with iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
BOOTSTACK_MASQ_NEW fails for /var/opt/undercloud-stack/masquerade

Comment 4 John Matthews 2016-07-25 14:41:14 UTC
Moved to post 1.0 GA

Comment 5 Jason Montleon 2016-07-25 14:43:33 UTC
The OSP bug has been moved to OSP 10. As GA will use OSP 8 this will not be fixed in time for GA