Bug 1280012

Summary: [Director] Director is deploying the lvm backend in a loop device that is not supported by GSS
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Mike Burns <mburns>
Component: documentationAssignee: Dan Macpherson <dmacpher>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 7.0 (Kilo)CC: calfonso, ebarrera, gfidente, jcoufal, jslagle, jstransk, kbasil, mburns, mcornea, ohochman, rhel-osp-director-maint, rhos-maint, sasha, vcojot, yeylon
Target Milestone: y2Keywords: Documentation, Triaged
Target Release: 7.0 (Kilo)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1271266
: 1301427 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-01-25 01:42:04 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1271266    
Bug Blocks: 1301427    

Comment 2 Dan Macpherson 2015-12-08 04:59:29 UTC 
mburns, how does the suggestion in comment #2 sound?
Comment 3 Mike Burns 2015-12-08 17:23:51 UTC 
(In reply to Dan Macpherson from comment #2)
> mburns, how does the suggestion in comment #2 sound?

Makes sense to me.  Adding Giulio
Comment 9 Dan Macpherson 2016-01-22 03:53:06 UTC 
Okay, this should now be live, including the SELinux option: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/7/html/Director_Installation_and_Usage/sect-Scenario_2_Using_the_CLI_to_Create_a_Basic_Overcloud.html#sect-Configuring_NFS_Storage

Mike, Jiri -- Any further additions required for this section?
Comment 10 Mike Burns 2016-01-22 12:19:00 UTC 
I don't see anything else needed, but I'll defer @jistr
Comment 11 Mike Burns 2016-01-22 12:19:31 UTC 
(readding jistr)
Comment 12 Jiri Stransky 2016-01-22 12:32:51 UTC 
Yes the NFS config looks correct to me, thanks Dan.

(For OSPd 8 we'll probably need to update it to use `parameter_defaults` instead of `parameters`, but not for OSPd 7.)
Comment 13 Dan Macpherson 2016-01-25 01:42:04 UTC 
Jiri, no prob. I'll make a note of that for OSP 8.

Closing this bug