Bug 128093

Summary:	finger-0.17-24 (from FEDORA-2004-181) isn't pushed to development repository
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	finger	Assignee:	Phil Knirsch <pknirsch>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	rvokal
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	EasyFix
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-09-01 17:56:39 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	123268

Description Robert Scheck 2004-07-17 16:40:43 UTC

Description of problem:
finger-0.17-24 (from FEDORA-2004-181) isn't pushed to development 
repository, I only can find finger-0.17-22 there.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
finger-0.17-22

Actual results:
Well, I think -24 also should be pushed to the development tree, 
because from the changelog of -22:

Finger mishandled stale utmp entries and also entries from remote X 
sessions. This would cause random idle times and spurious users to 
be shown.

Expected results:
-24 or newer in development repository.

Comment 1 Phil Knirsch 2004-07-28 11:52:50 UTC

Update of development was stuck for a couple of days, should all be
set now again. Package should appear in the next few days.

Read ya, Phil

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2004-08-06 16:29:28 UTC

The package didn't appear the last 10 days after your message 
(including today's update). Maybe something is broken anyway? Could 
you have a look to it, please?

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2004-08-17 22:53:46 UTC

More than 10 days later, -24 or newer isn't anyway at Rawhide...

Comment 4 Elliot Lee 2004-09-01 17:50:15 UTC

Phil needs to build a new finger for FC3 - release 24 was made
available as an FC2 update only.

Comment 5 Elliot Lee 2004-09-01 17:56:39 UTC

Bah, I've just gone ahead and built it like I should have originally.