Bug 1281674
Summary: | [kernel] network broken in virtual machines - error message 'virbr0: set_features() failed (-1); ..' - | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Joachim Frieben <jfrieben> | ||||
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | gansalmon, itamar, jonathan, kernel-maint, kevin, labbott, linville, madhu.chinakonda, mchehab | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | kernel-4.4.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc24 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2015-11-19 14:36:03 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Joachim Frieben
2015-11-13 05:52:12 UTC
I'm seeing this here also with tun devices... they seem to come up and connect, but no tcp/udp passes. (ICMP seems to however). [ 331.110565] tun0: set_features() failed (-1); wanted 0x00000080000048c1, left 0x00000080001b48c9 Created attachment 1093852 [details]
potential fix
There is a thread about this upstream, can you try the following test patch that was proposed?
Issue still present for kernel-4.4.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc24. I just tried http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11824289 with the potential fix and it seems to fix it up here. ;) (In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #4) Weird, I have just retrieved and installed kernel-4.4.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc24 a 2nd time and now, it actually resolves the issue. Which one? The scratch build from comment 4? or the official one? they are named the same, but the scratch build has the patch added. (In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #6) Right, it is the scratch build from comment 4, maybe I messed it up with the normal build when downloading for the first time. (In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #6) The situation is the following: when Laura had informed me about her scratch build, I had already downloaded, installed and negatively tested the latest kernel build kernel-4.4.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc24 from https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2431/11822431 . After your reply, I downloaded kernel-4.4.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc24 again but this time from https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4292/11824292 , and indeed, this build does solve the reported kernel error for me which is perfectly consistent. I suppose that the next regular build will eventually include the patch. The patch has been included in the rawhide kernel. I haven't heard anything from upstream despite mentioning that the patch worked. |