Bug 1281674 - [kernel] network broken in virtual machines - error message 'virbr0: set_features() failed (-1); ..' -
Summary: [kernel] network broken in virtual machines - error message 'virbr0: set_feat...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-11-13 05:52 UTC by Joachim Frieben
Modified: 2015-11-19 14:36 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: kernel-4.4.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc24
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 14:36:03 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
potential fix (3.25 KB, patch)
2015-11-13 20:47 UTC, Laura Abbott
no flags Details | Diff

Description Joachim Frieben 2015-11-13 05:52:12 UTC
Description of problem:
Virtual network devices in recent 4.4.x development kernel do not work. Accordingly, no network is available in virtual machines.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-4.4.0-0.rc0.git8.2.fc24

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot fully updated development system.

Actual results:
Command 'dmesg' reveals error messages related to virtual network devices like virbr0 and tap0 which read

    "virbr0: set_features() failed (-1); .." .

Network is broken in virtual machines.

Expected results:
No kernel errors and functional virtual network devices.

Additional info:
Downgrade to kernel 4.3.x restores normal behaviour.

Comment 1 Kevin Fenzi 2015-11-13 20:10:32 UTC
I'm seeing this here also with tun devices... they seem to come up and connect, but no tcp/udp passes. (ICMP seems to however). 

[  331.110565] tun0: set_features() failed (-1); wanted 0x00000080000048c1, left 0x00000080001b48c9

Comment 2 Laura Abbott 2015-11-13 20:47:48 UTC
Created attachment 1093852 [details]
potential fix

There is a thread about this upstream, can you try the following test patch that was proposed?

Comment 3 Joachim Frieben 2015-11-13 22:14:31 UTC
Issue still present for kernel-4.4.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc24.

Comment 4 Kevin Fenzi 2015-11-13 22:23:03 UTC
I just tried http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11824289 with the potential fix and it seems to fix it up here. ;)

Comment 5 Joachim Frieben 2015-11-13 22:56:46 UTC
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #4)
Weird, I have just retrieved and installed kernel-4.4.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc24 a 2nd time and now, it actually resolves the issue.

Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2015-11-13 23:01:59 UTC
Which one? The scratch build from comment 4? or the official one? they are named the same, but the scratch build has the patch added.

Comment 7 Joachim Frieben 2015-11-14 03:09:54 UTC
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #6)
Right, it is the scratch build from comment 4, maybe I messed it up with the normal build when downloading for the first time.

Comment 8 Joachim Frieben 2015-11-14 05:35:28 UTC
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #6)
The situation is the following: when Laura had informed me about her scratch build, I had already downloaded, installed and negatively tested the latest kernel build kernel-4.4.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc24 from

    https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2431/11822431 .

After your reply, I downloaded kernel-4.4.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc24 again but this time from

    https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4292/11824292 ,

and indeed, this build does solve the reported kernel error for me which is perfectly consistent. I suppose that the next regular build will eventually include the patch.

Comment 9 Laura Abbott 2015-11-16 23:17:25 UTC
The patch has been included in the rawhide kernel. I haven't heard anything from upstream despite mentioning that the patch worked.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.