Bug 1282080
Summary: | Review Request: blackshades - First person shooter - protect the VIP | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Brigham Keys <bkeys> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | anto.trande, bkeys, package-review, rosser.bjr, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | AwaitingSubmitter | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-04-07 09:07:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 177841, 201449, 1364745 |
Description
Brigham Keys
2015-11-14 19:32:15 UTC
Hi, SRPM URL should be to the raw file: https://github.com/ComradeKeys/blackshadeselite/raw/master/fedora/blackshades-.9-1.fc21.src.rpm Also, at the first glance: - you should change the version number to 0.9 - full URL of the source archive is missing (Source0 tag) - no description I have: Changed the number to 0.9 The Source0 tag has the tarball, the url tag has the URL Wrote the description I cannot find a raw file in any of the files that RPM build generated. Unless you mean the tar.gz file? Please, provide SPEC/SRPM links if you still need a package review. - /usr/bin/%{name} Use the macros: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros - Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Where does source code archive come from? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL - rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Useless. - COPYING is not tagged with %license. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text - Decription is too ling for a single line: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues?rd=PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#description-line-too-long Any news here ? |