Bug 1282243
| Summary: | pysendfile: Suggest to update the upstream link and version for Python 3 supports | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Lee <michaeleekk> | ||||
| Component: | pysendfile | Assignee: | Tomas Orsava <torsava> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | dkrejci, mhroncok, pviktori, rbryant, torsava | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | pysendfile-2.0.1-1.fc25 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-07-08 15:56:48 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1285816, 1333770 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Michael Lee
2015-11-15 18:09:24 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle. Changing version to '24'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase Russell, do you need any help with the update, or with supporting Python 3? Created attachment 1166005 [details] Python 3 patch for specfile Hi Russell, here is the change needed to add Python 3 support. Could you please review it and do the update? Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14421908 Also tested in Mock (fedora-23-x86_64, fedora-24-x86_64, fedora-rawhide-i386, fedora-rawhide-x86_64). The patch looks good, Dominika, thank you! Hi Russell, as this is a bit of a time sensitive issue, we would really appreciate if you could take a look at the patch as soon as possible. If you are time constrained right now, I hope you won't mind if we do the review and push the changes ourselves in case you are unable. Thank you! |