Bug 1282243 - pysendfile: Suggest to update the upstream link and version for Python 3 supports
pysendfile: Suggest to update the upstream link and version for Python 3 supp...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pysendfile (Show other bugs)
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tomas Orsava
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2015-11-15 13:09 EST by Michael Lee
Modified: 2017-08-07 08:41 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: pysendfile-2.0.1-1.fc25
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2016-07-08 11:56:48 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Python 3 patch for specfile (4.17 KB, patch)
2016-06-08 08:49 EDT, Dominika Krejčí
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Michael Lee 2015-11-15 13:09:24 EST
Description of problem:

Upstream link changed to from Google Code to github.

New version 2.0.1 suggested to support Python 3.
Comment 1 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 08:58:42 EST
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
Comment 2 Petr Viktorin 2016-04-19 10:39:58 EDT
Russell, do you need any help with the update, or with supporting Python 3?
Comment 3 Dominika Krejčí 2016-06-08 08:49 EDT
Created attachment 1166005 [details]
Python 3 patch for specfile

Hi Russell,
here is the change needed to add Python 3 support. Could you please review it and do the update?

Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14421908

Also tested in Mock (fedora-23-x86_64, fedora-24-x86_64, fedora-rawhide-i386, fedora-rawhide-x86_64).
Comment 4 Tomas Orsava 2016-06-09 05:41:27 EDT
The patch looks good, Dominika, thank you!
Comment 5 Tomas Orsava 2016-06-09 05:42:01 EDT
Hi Russell,
as this is a bit of a time sensitive issue, we would really appreciate if you could take a look at the patch as soon as possible.
If you are time constrained right now, I hope you won't mind if we do the review and push the changes ourselves in case you are unable.

Thank you!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.