Bug 128471
| Summary: | ksh RPM should obsoletes: ksh93 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] Bugzilla | Reporter: | Brian Long <brilong> |
| Component: | Bugzilla General | Assignee: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 2.17 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2004-09-13 16:58:33 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
How does one properly log a bug against things in the RHEL "Extras" or "Extras Beta" channels? ksh is included in the RHEL 3 U3 Extras Beta channel and I'd like to see the RPM "obsoletes: ksh93". THanks. Added ksh component to RHEL Bugzilla product. |
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040204 Description of problem: The component "ksh" is not available in bugzilla. This applies to ksh found in the Q3 Errata beta. There has been a publicly available "ksh93" rpm for years. Many folks have replaced "pdksh" in RHEL 3 with the ksh93 rpm. Since Red Hat chose to include ksh-2004 in this update, please update the SPEC file to "Obsoletes: ksh93". This way your ksh RPM provides a proper upgrade path from the older public-domain ksh93 RPM. Thanks! Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -U ksh-2004*.rpm 2. 3. Actual Results: Tries to install conflicting files with the ksh93 RPM. Expected Results: Upgrades the existing ksh93 RPM. Additional info: