Bug 1285179

Summary:	Automation of Gluster development workflow
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Nandaja Varma <nvarma>
Component:	scripts	Assignee:	Raghavendra G <rgowdapp>
Status:	CLOSED EOL	QA Contact:
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.7.0	CC:	bugs, smohan
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-03-08 10:52:33 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nandaja Varma 2015-11-25 07:57:07 UTC

Description of problem:

Gluster development workflow is to be automated more so as to update the bug status as soon as corresponding patches are sent to gerrit 

More details: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-automated-bug-workflow 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Patch submissions do not automatically change bug status in Bugzilla

Expected results:

development workflow should be more automated.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 10:29:20 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#1) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 2 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 10:49:15 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#2) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 3 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 10:58:19 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#3) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 4 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 11:18:17 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#4) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 5 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 12:04:27 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#5) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 6 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 12:05:39 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#6) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 7 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 12:06:12 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#7) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 8 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 12:11:32 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#8) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 9 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 12:13:25 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#9) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 10 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 13:20:02 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#10) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 11 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 13:21:05 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#11) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 12 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 13:24:21 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#12) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 13 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 13:25:30 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#13) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)

Comment 14 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 09:18:25 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#1) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)

Comment 15 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 10:20:12 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#2) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)

Comment 16 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 10:26:53 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#3) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)

Comment 17 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 10:29:32 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#4) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)

Comment 18 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 10:34:20 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 ($'Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#5) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)

Comment 19 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 11:17:22 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12822 (rfc.sh : Modifications to new developer workflow) posted (#1) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)

Comment 20 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 11:50:11 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12822 (rfc.sh : Modifications to new developer workflow) posted (#2) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)

Comment 21 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 11:50:29 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12822 (rfc.sh : Modifications to new developer workflow) posted (#3) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)

Comment 24 Kaushal 2017-03-08 10:52:33 UTC

This bug is getting closed because GlusteFS-3.7 has reached its end-of-life.

Note: This bug is being closed using a script. No verification has been performed to check if it still exists on newer releases of GlusterFS.
If this bug still exists in newer GlusterFS releases, please reopen this bug against the newer release.