Description of problem: Gluster development workflow is to be automated more so as to update the bug status as soon as corresponding patches are sent to gerrit More details: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-automated-bug-workflow Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Patch submissions do not automatically change bug status in Bugzilla Expected results: development workflow should be more automated. Additional info:
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#1) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#2) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#3) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#4) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#5) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#6) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#7) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#8) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#9) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#10) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#11) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#12) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#13) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#1) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#2) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#3) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#4) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 ($'Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#5) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12822 (rfc.sh : Modifications to new developer workflow) posted (#1) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12822 (rfc.sh : Modifications to new developer workflow) posted (#2) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12822 (rfc.sh : Modifications to new developer workflow) posted (#3) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga)
This bug is getting closed because GlusteFS-3.7 has reached its end-of-life. Note: This bug is being closed using a script. No verification has been performed to check if it still exists on newer releases of GlusterFS. If this bug still exists in newer GlusterFS releases, please reopen this bug against the newer release.