Bug 1285179 - Automation of Gluster development workflow
Summary: Automation of Gluster development workflow
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: scripts
Version: 3.7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Raghavendra G
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-11-25 07:57 UTC by Nandaja Varma
Modified: 2017-03-08 10:52 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-08 10:52:33 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nandaja Varma 2015-11-25 07:57:07 UTC
Description of problem:

Gluster development workflow is to be automated more so as to update the bug status as soon as corresponding patches are sent to gerrit 

More details: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-automated-bug-workflow 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Patch submissions do not automatically change bug status in Bugzilla

Expected results:

development workflow should be more automated.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 10:29:20 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#1) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 2 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 10:49:15 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#2) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 3 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 10:58:19 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#3) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 4 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 11:18:17 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#4) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 5 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 12:04:27 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#5) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 6 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 12:05:39 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#6) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 7 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 12:06:12 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#7) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 8 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 12:11:32 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#8) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 9 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 12:13:25 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#9) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 10 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 13:20:02 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#10) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 11 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 13:21:05 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#11) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 12 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 13:24:21 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#12) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 13 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-25 13:25:30 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12746 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#13) for review on master by Nandaja Varma (nandaja.varma@gmail.com)

Comment 14 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 09:18:25 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#1) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga@redhat.com)

Comment 15 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 10:20:12 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#2) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga@redhat.com)

Comment 16 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 10:26:53 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#3) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga@redhat.com)

Comment 17 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 10:29:32 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 (Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#4) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga@redhat.com)

Comment 18 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 10:34:20 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12817 ($'Modifications to rfc.sh for the new developer work flow) posted (#5) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga@redhat.com)

Comment 19 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 11:17:22 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12822 (rfc.sh : Modifications to new developer workflow) posted (#1) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga@redhat.com)

Comment 20 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 11:50:11 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12822 (rfc.sh : Modifications to new developer workflow) posted (#2) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga@redhat.com)

Comment 21 Vijay Bellur 2015-11-30 11:50:29 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12822 (rfc.sh : Modifications to new developer workflow) posted (#3) for review on master by Manikandan Selvaganesh (mselvaga@redhat.com)

Comment 24 Kaushal 2017-03-08 10:52:33 UTC
This bug is getting closed because GlusteFS-3.7 has reached its end-of-life.

Note: This bug is being closed using a script. No verification has been performed to check if it still exists on newer releases of GlusterFS.
If this bug still exists in newer GlusterFS releases, please reopen this bug against the newer release.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.