Bug 1288927

Summary:	Review Request: libsylph - E-Mail client library
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	IWAI, Masaharu <iwaim.sub>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dan, itsme_410, package-review, zbyszek
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-01-10 20:21:44 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description IWAI, Masaharu 2015-12-07 03:13:35 UTC

Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iwaim/fedora-pkgs/master/review/libsylph/libsylph.spec
SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iwaim/fedora-pkgs/master/review/libsylph/libsylph-1.1.0-1.el6.src.rpm

Description: 
LibSylph is an e-mail client library which is derived from Sylpheed.
LibSylph is a lightweight but featureful library. It has many common e-mail
related features and other useful functions, and you can utilize them from
your application. Moreover you can create a new e-mail client by wrapping
LibSylph with any UI.
Fedora Account System Username: iwaim

Comment 1 Ranjan Maitra 2015-12-12 01:20:29 UTC

Your rpm does not build. Here is what I get. 

No translations found for libsylph in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libsylph-1.1.0-1
.fc24.x86_64
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VGz6EM (%install)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VGz6EM (%install)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.


Please also review your package using the fedora-review tool.

Comment 2 IWAI, Masaharu 2015-12-21 16:41:02 UTC

(In reply to Ranjan Maitra from comment #1) 
> Please also review your package using the fedora-review tool.

Thanks. I ran the fedora-review tool. And I fixed spec file.

Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iwaim/fedora-pkgs/master/review/libsylph/libsylph.spec
SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iwaim/fedora-pkgs/master/review/libsylph/libsylph-1.1.0-2.fc23.src.rpm

Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2015-12-29 21:39:46 UTC

Guys, please pay attention to the Review Process description. It's not so difficult.

The fedora-review tags is not to be touched by anyone else than the reviewer assigned to the ticket.

Messing with the fedora-review flag or other ticket details can lead to hiding the ticket in ways it becomes very difficult to find when using the review tracker: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/

Comment 4 Dan Horák 2016-01-07 22:11:01 UTC

Wouldn't the up-to-date version of libsylph that already exists and is provided by the sylpheed package (and sylpheed-devel for the development headers and lib) satisfy your needs? Discussion about moving the libsylph into an own subpackage is happening now in bug 1265685.

Comment 5 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-01-10 20:21:44 UTC

Masaharu, it seems that we now have a newer version of the library available as sylpheed-libs, built from the sylpheed source rpm. So it's not useful to package the standalone version which is older. I'm closing this bug.

Thank you for working on this package. I hope you can find a different way to contribute and Fedora does not lose you as a contributor.