Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iwaim/fedora-pkgs/master/review/libsylph/libsylph.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iwaim/fedora-pkgs/master/review/libsylph/libsylph-1.1.0-1.el6.src.rpm Description: LibSylph is an e-mail client library which is derived from Sylpheed. LibSylph is a lightweight but featureful library. It has many common e-mail related features and other useful functions, and you can utilize them from your application. Moreover you can create a new e-mail client by wrapping LibSylph with any UI. Fedora Account System Username: iwaim
Your rpm does not build. Here is what I get. No translations found for libsylph in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libsylph-1.1.0-1 .fc24.x86_64 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VGz6EM (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VGz6EM (%install) Child return code was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. Please also review your package using the fedora-review tool.
(In reply to Ranjan Maitra from comment #1) > Please also review your package using the fedora-review tool. Thanks. I ran the fedora-review tool. And I fixed spec file. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iwaim/fedora-pkgs/master/review/libsylph/libsylph.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iwaim/fedora-pkgs/master/review/libsylph/libsylph-1.1.0-2.fc23.src.rpm
Guys, please pay attention to the Review Process description. It's not so difficult. The fedora-review tags is not to be touched by anyone else than the reviewer assigned to the ticket. Messing with the fedora-review flag or other ticket details can lead to hiding the ticket in ways it becomes very difficult to find when using the review tracker: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/
Wouldn't the up-to-date version of libsylph that already exists and is provided by the sylpheed package (and sylpheed-devel for the development headers and lib) satisfy your needs? Discussion about moving the libsylph into an own subpackage is happening now in bug 1265685.
Masaharu, it seems that we now have a newer version of the library available as sylpheed-libs, built from the sylpheed source rpm. So it's not useful to package the standalone version which is older. I'm closing this bug. Thank you for working on this package. I hope you can find a different way to contribute and Fedora does not lose you as a contributor.