Bug 128906
| Summary: | Multiple perl SRPMS have conflicting filter-depends.sh | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Blair Zajac <blair> | ||||
| Component: | perl | Assignee: | Chip Turner <cturner> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | redhat-bugzilla | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2004-08-02 14:38:52 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Theoretically the file names for patches and scripts in spec files are unique - as I saw it the last years at Red Hat. Maybe some patches were modified later and were not synchronised... :-( Workaround: Install the first source package and rebuild it, then use the secound and go on like that. sometimes it's filter-depends, sometimes it's filter-requires, sometimes it's filter-depends-NAME, sometimes it's filter-requires-NAME. Pretty much random as to which it is. I'm not personally going to fix it proactively, but I will try to fix them as I work on packages. patches, though, will be applied more quickly, so please feel free to help out that way. otherwise it'll be a slow target-of-opportunity process Are you saying that you won't push a new RPM release just for this issue, but if there's a patch to fix this issue and when there's a new release, you'll include it? If that's the case, I'm attaching a patch for perl.spec. Of course, the filter*.sh will have to be renamed separately. When you do a new perl SRPM, do you look for CLOSED/DEFERRED bugs? Is this the proper state for a bug with a patch in it? Regards, Blair Created attachment 102366 [details]
Rename filter-depends.sh to filter-depends-perl.sh.
|
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040707 Firefox/0.9.2 Description of problem: Hello, I pulled down all of the perl source RPMs from Fedora to make some local modifications to them for our local installation. Several of the srpms have a filter-depends.sh and depending upon the order that you unpack the srpms, you'll get a broken build. In my case, I did an rpm -ivh \ perl-5.8.5-2.src.rpm \ perl-libwww-perl-5.79-1.src.rpm \ perl-Net-DNS-0.45-3.src and my perl build doesn't install because the Mac:: and other dependencies are not filtered out. These are the three perl srpms that I found that contain the identically named yet different files. I have my ~/.rpmmacros set up like this: %_topdir /export/home1/blair/RPMs/build %_builddir %{_topdir}/BUILD %_rpmdir %{_topdir}/RPMS %_sourcedir %{_topdir}/SOURCES %_specdir %{_topdir}/SPECS %_srcrpmdir %{_topdir}/SRPMS %_tmppath %{_topdir}/TMP I'm guessing that at RedHat these conflicts do not occur, but could these three files be given unique names such as filter-depends-perl-net-dns.sh? Thanks, Blair Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.5-2 How reproducible: Always