Bug 1291861
| Summary: | Catalog Item : Editing a catalog item after deleting provider shows error | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | John Prause <jprause> |
| Component: | Provisioning | Assignee: | lgalis |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Shveta <sshveta> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.4.0 | CC: | cpelland, dajohnso, drieden, gmccullo, jhardy, jprause, lgalis, mfeifer, obarenbo, sshveta |
| Target Milestone: | GA | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | 5.5.5 | Flags: | sshveta:
automate_bug-
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | service:catalog | ||
| Fixed In Version: | 5.5.5.2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
In a previous CloudForms version, editing a catalog item after deleting a provider resulted in an error. The error was raised during a check by miq_provision_virt_workflow.rb, which then prevented the user interface from loading the workflow. The code now checks an object's existence before calling a method on it and catalog items can be edited successfully.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 1210541 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2016-07-26 15:30:48 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1210541 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 1261968 | ||
|
Comment 5
Shveta
2016-07-06 23:12:56 UTC
Hi , Please check https://10.16.5.163. Catalog name "edit_catalog" . Click on it to see the error . Thanks , Shveta Fixed . verified in 5.5.5.2.20160712144556_629f93b Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1488.html |