Bug 1291867
Summary: | [conn] show progress when repo has metalink | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christian Stadelmann <fedora> |
Component: | dnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 24 | CC: | fedora, jmracek, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, vmukhame |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | dnf-2.5.1-1.fc26 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-06-16 13:18:42 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Christian Stadelmann
2015-12-15 18:47:59 UTC
(In reply to Christian Stadelmann from comment #0) > If a mirror is offline and skip_if_unavailable is False You probably meant True Do you still have such problems? I believe these were temporary rpmfusion server issues. Can you try it again and set `timeout` dnf config value /etc/dnf/dnf.conf to lower value than default and post result, please? + attach the data described here [1], please. [1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/wiki/Bug-Reporting#connection-issue > > If a mirror is offline and skip_if_unavailable is False > You probably meant True Yes, I meant True. > > Do you still have such problems? I believe these were temporary rpmfusion > server issues. Can you try it again and set `timeout` dnf config value > /etc/dnf/dnf.conf to lower value than default and post result, please? > + attach the data described here [1], please. > > [1] > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/wiki/Bug-Reporting#connection- > issue $ rpm -q librepo curl dnf librepo-1.7.16-2.fc23.x86_64 curl-7.43.0-4.fc23.x86_64 dnf-1.1.5-1.fc23.noarch I wasn't able to reproduce and the /var/log/dnf.librepo.log file doesn't have timestamps and has gone already. Is it possible that the timeout (default: 30seconds) was just applied to each repo successively, maybe even two or three times per repo when retrying? (In reply to Christian Stadelmann from comment #3) > Is it possible that the timeout (default: 30seconds) was just applied to > each repo successively, maybe even two or three times per repo when retrying? The timeout is for one repo. Ok, that probably has been the cause then. With 6 rpmfusion repos enabled it waited at least 3 minutes. This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Ok, a have found that timeout in dnf is set to 120 s and it differs from yum. I create PR that changed it to 30 s like in yum (https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/824). Probably it helps. The showing a progress if used metalink it would be tricky, because we use at the same time 3 downloads in parallel and each of downloads could be handled from different server. But probably we will improve that also in future. dnf-plugins-core-2.1.1-1.fc26 libdnf-0.9.1-1.fc26 dnf-2.5.1-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c87c47dccb dnf-2.5.1-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-core-2.1.1-1.fc26, libdnf-0.9.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c87c47dccb dnf-2.5.1-1.fc26 dnf-plugins-core-2.1.1-1.fc26 dnfdaemon-0.3.18-3.fc26 libdnf-0.9.1-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c87c47dccb dnf-2.5.1-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-core-2.1.1-1.fc26, dnfdaemon-0.3.18-3.fc26, libdnf-0.9.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c87c47dccb dnf-2.5.1-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-core-2.1.1-1.fc26, dnfdaemon-0.3.18-3.fc26, libdnf-0.9.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |