Bug 1292879

Summary:	iptables: bad rule
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Jason Montleon <jmontleo>
Component:	rhosp-director	Assignee:	Hugh Brock <hbrock>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Shai Revivo <srevivo>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.0 (Kilo)	CC:	dajohnso, dsneddon, jcoufal, jmatthew, mburns, rhel-osp-director-maint, tcarlin
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	10.0 (Newton)
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1278853	Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-10-14 18:50:17 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1278853

Description Jason Montleon 2015-12-18 16:00:41 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1278853 +++

Description of problem:

Error during fusor-undercloud-installer

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

This install was completed from an ISO with the Media ID 1446663134.881279 at 06:52:14 PM on 04 Nov 2015.

How reproducible:

Unsure, believe 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install TripleO ISO
2. Log in for launch-fusor-undercloud-installer
3.

Actual results:

iptables: bad rule (does a matching rule exist in that chain?)

Expected results:

No error, iptables successfully setup

Additional info:

Command is: add-rule INPUT -p tcp --dport 8088 -j ACCEPT
(says "active" just before error)

--- Additional comment from Thom Carlin on 2015-11-06 10:02:12 EST ---

Also occurs further down for:
* port 69
* ports "8773, 8774, 8775"
* ports "5000, 35357"
* port 9696
etc.

Works for:
* port 8585
and other

br-ctlplane also fails just below these with iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
BOOTSTACK_MASQ_NEW fails for /var/opt/undercloud-stack/masquerade

Comment 3 Jason Montleon 2015-12-18 16:06:06 UTC

*** Bug 1292880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Mike Burns 2016-04-07 21:00:12 UTC

This bug did not make the OSP 8.0 release.  It is being deferred to OSP 10.

Comment 7 Dan Sneddon 2016-10-14 18:50:17 UTC

This bug is no longer relevant, this was fixed long ago.