Bug 1297260
Summary: | virt-viewer console will restore a larger window when use mouse to drag the window to minimum | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | mxie <mxie> |
Component: | virt-viewer | Assignee: | Virt Viewer Maint <virt-viewer-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.3 | CC: | cfergeau, dblechte, fidencio, juzhou, mxie, mzhan, pgrunt, rbalakri, tzheng, virt-bugs, virt-viewer-maint, xiaodwan |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | virt-viewer-2.0-7.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1296878 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2016-11-04 01:14:04 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1296878 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Comment 2
Fabiano FidĂȘncio
2016-03-15 15:37:35 UTC
I can reproduce it with virt-viewer-2.0-6.el7.x86_64. # rpm -q virt-viewer virt-viewer-2.0-6.el7.x86_64 Then updated virt-viewer to latest virt-viewer-2.0-7.el7.x86_64 and verified with below steps again. The issue is fixed. Steps: 1.Prepare a rhel6 guest or a rhel7 guest and use virt-viewer connect to the guest 2. Use mouse to drag the window to minimum, then virt-viewer window size will keep at 320x200 even if using mouse to drag the window to small size 3. Check the resolution of guest, the resolution should be 320x200 So move the bug from ON_QA to VERIFIED. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2229.html |