Bug 1298118
| Summary: | Unable to get the client statedump, as /var/run/gluster directory is not available by default | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | SATHEESARAN <sasundar> | |
| Component: | build | Assignee: | Milind Changire <mchangir> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | SATHEESARAN <sasundar> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | rhgs-3.1 | CC: | amukherj, ndevos, nlevinki, rcyriac, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, sankarshan | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | |||
| Target Release: | RHGS 3.2.0 | |||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1302200 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-03-23 05:26:32 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | 1302200 | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1302202, 1351522 | |||
|
Description
SATHEESARAN
2016-01-13 10:03:53 UTC
As per downstream glusterfs.spec.in, /var/run/gluster is packaged only with the glusterfs-server RPM and specifically excluded for non-server RPM packaging. So any client only RPM install will not have that directory created. Also, as per Niels comment for his upstream patch on making /var/run/gluster available, it should have been made available for native client installs as well ... but its not so in downstream packaging. I'll have to move the directory packaging in downstream RPMs to a common RPM like the primary package 'glusterfs'. Is this acceptable? (In reply to Milind Changire from comment #1) ... > I'll have to move the directory packaging in downstream RPMs to a common RPM > like the primary package 'glusterfs'. > > Is this acceptable? Yes, that should be acceptable. Please make sure to file a bug+patch for this in upstream as well if the problem exists there still. Tested with glusterfs-3.8.4-3.el7 and glusterfs-3.8.4-3.el6 /var/run/gluster directory is created by glusterfs package # rpm -qf /var/run/gluster/ glusterfs-3.8.4-3.el7.x86_64 # rpm -qf /var/run/gluster glusterfs-3.8.4-3.el6.x86_64 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0486.html |