Bug 1300037

Summary:	New Service Catalog item form is broken if type is Orchestration
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	John Prause <jprause>
Component:	UI - OPS	Assignee:	Eric Winchell <ewinchel>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Taras Lehinevych <tlehinev>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.5.0	CC:	dajohnso, ewinchel, hkataria, jhardy, mfeifer, mpovolny, obarenbo, vrutkovs
Target Milestone:	GA	Keywords:	ZStream
Target Release:	5.5.3
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	5.5.3.2	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1299848	Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-04-13 18:41:30 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1299848
Bug Blocks:

Description John Prause 2016-01-19 19:31:05 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1299848 +++

Description of problem:
New Service Catalog item form has insufficient space for Orchestration Template field

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.5.2.1

How reproducible:
Always, both in Firefox and Chrome

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to Services -> Catalogs -> Catalog Items
2. Add a new Catalog Item, select Catalog Item Type = Orchestration

Actual results:
Catalog Item form is broken, see screenshot

Expected results:
Catalog Item form is displayed correctly

Additional info:

Comment 2 Eric Winchell 2016-02-15 14:41:44 UTC

http://gitlab.cloudforms.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/cloudforms/cfme/merge_requests/751

Comment 4 Taras Lehinevych 2016-03-28 09:16:53 UTC

Verified in 5.5.3.2

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2016-04-13 18:41:30 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:0616