Bug 1303007

Summary: Arch-specific libreoffice-headless Provide cannot be used as a build-require
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Petr Pisar <ppisar>
Component: libreofficeAssignee: David Tardon <dtardon>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: caolanm, dtardon, erack, ltinkl, mstahl, sbergman
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-22 18:54:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Petr Pisar 2016-01-29 09:40:59 UTC
Since commit:

commit 6456d6e5f30c55a43cd923e2fdbb3a6b79a3ca9d
Author: David Tardon <dtardon>
Date:   Sat Dec 26 16:26:28 2015 +0100

    make all deps arch-specific

libreoffice-core provides libreoffice-headless(x86-64) instead of libreoffice-headless. This makes the symbol unusable in build-requires because build-requires are forbidden to be arch-specific (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRequires_and_.25.7B_isa.7D).

This prevents perl-OpenOffice-UNO from building <http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12722131>.

We could change the build-require to libreoffice-core that is arch-independent, but I'd like to know your opinion. Is libreoffice-headless symbol deprecrated, or will you remove the %{?_isa} from the Provide?

Comment 1 David Tardon 2016-02-11 08:43:00 UTC
We should provide both plain and %{?_isa} version, to match rpmbuild-generated Provides.