Bug 1305101

Summary: New spec file to make package spec file compliant to Fedora packaging guidelines for Python
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Germano Massullo <germano.massullo>
Component: python-docoptAssignee: Martin Sivák <msivak>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 22CC: miminar, msivak, sgallagh
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-docopt-0.6.2-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-05 16:37:39 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1302770    
Attachments:
Description Flags
python-docopt.spec none

Description Germano Massullo 2016-02-05 15:39:45 UTC 
Created attachment 1121422 [details]
python-docopt.spec

Description of problem:
Package review request
======
Bug 1302770 Review Request: python-coveralls - Coveralls.io is service to publish your coverage stats online with a lot of nice features - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1302770
======
had problems with python-docopt since package python-docopt did not provide a python2-docopt package in Fedora repositories.

I made a new spec file in order to make package spec file compliant to Fedora packaging guidelines for Python.
rpmbuild works perfectly with it
Comment 1 Raphael Groner 2016-02-05 16:27:01 UTC 
What's the bug here?
Comment 2 Martin Sivák 2016-02-05 16:29:03 UTC 
Thanks. If you would like to become (co-)maintainer, I will gladly approve it :)
Comment 3 Martin Sivák 2016-02-05 16:37:39 UTC 
Build went fine, so it will show up in rawhide as soon as the repo is refreshed.
Comment 4 Germano Massullo 2016-02-05 22:58:07 UTC 
(In reply to Martin Sivák from comment #2)
> Thanks. If you would like to become (co-)maintainer, I will gladly approve
> it :)

Request already sent :-)

(In reply to Martin Sivák from comment #3)
> Build went fine, so it will show up in rawhide as soon as the repo is
> refreshed.

What about the EPEL release?