Bug 1305101 - New spec file to make package spec file compliant to Fedora packaging guidelines for Python
New spec file to make package spec file compliant to Fedora packaging guideli...
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-docopt (Show other bugs)
22
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Martin Sivák
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1302770
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-02-05 10:39 EST by Germano Massullo
Modified: 2016-02-06 05:46 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: python-docopt-0.6.2-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-05 11:37:39 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
python-docopt.spec (4.77 KB, text/x-matlab)
2016-02-05 10:39 EST, Germano Massullo
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Germano Massullo 2016-02-05 10:39:45 EST
Created attachment 1121422 [details]
python-docopt.spec

Description of problem:
Package review request
======
Bug 1302770 Review Request: python-coveralls - Coveralls.io is service to publish your coverage stats online with a lot of nice features - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1302770
======
had problems with python-docopt since package python-docopt did not provide a python2-docopt package in Fedora repositories.

I made a new spec file in order to make package spec file compliant to Fedora packaging guidelines for Python.
rpmbuild works perfectly with it
Comment 1 Raphael Groner 2016-02-05 11:27:01 EST
What's the bug here?
Comment 2 Martin Sivák 2016-02-05 11:29:03 EST
Thanks. If you would like to become (co-)maintainer, I will gladly approve it :)
Comment 3 Martin Sivák 2016-02-05 11:37:39 EST
Build went fine, so it will show up in rawhide as soon as the repo is refreshed.
Comment 4 Germano Massullo 2016-02-05 17:58:07 EST
(In reply to Martin Sivák from comment #2)
> Thanks. If you would like to become (co-)maintainer, I will gladly approve
> it :)

Request already sent :-)

(In reply to Martin Sivák from comment #3)
> Build went fine, so it will show up in rawhide as soon as the repo is
> refreshed.

What about the EPEL release?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.